fixed some typos @ internet draft

1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions

diff --git a/draft-gsenger-secure-anycast-tunneling-protocol-02.html b/draft-gsenger-secure-anycast-tunneling-protocol-02.html
index 8b5e98d..80ab6c9 100644
--- a/draft-gsenger-secure-anycast-tunneling-protocol-02.html
+++ b/draft-gsenger-secure-anycast-tunneling-protocol-02.html
@@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ Tunneling from unicast hosts over anycast routers to other unicast hosts</h3>
   endpoint | using SATP    |  endpoint | using SATP    |  endpoint
 </pre></div><table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="2" align="center"><tr><td align="center"><font face="monaco, MS Sans Serif" size="1"><b>&nbsp;Figure&nbsp;1&nbsp;</b></font><br /></td></tr></table><hr class="insert" />
 
-<p>In this scenario the payload gets encapsuleted into a SATP packet by a unicast host and gets transmitted to one of the anycast routers. It than gets decapsulated by the router. This router makes a routing descision based on the underlying protocol and transmits a new SATP package to one or more unicast hosts depending on the routing descition.
+<p>In this scenario the payload gets encapsuleted into a SATP packet by a unicast host and gets transmitted to one of the anycast routers. It than gets decapsulated by the router. This router makes a routing descision based on the underlying protocol and transmits a new SATP package to one or more unicast hosts depending on the routing decision.
 </p>
 <a name="anchor6"></a><br /><hr />
 <table summary="layout" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="2" class="TOCbug" align="right"><tr><td class="TOCbug"><a href="#toc">&nbsp;TOC&nbsp;</a></td></tr></table>
@@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ padding (OPTIONAL)</h3>
 
 <p>Padding of max 255 octets.
 None of the pre-defined encryption transforms uses any padding; for
-   these, the plaintext and encrypted payload sizes match exactly. Transforms are based on transforms of the SRTP protocol and these transforms might use the RTP padding format, so a RTP like padding is supported. If the padding count field is present, than the padding count field MUST be set to the padding lenght.
+   these, the plaintext and encrypted payload sizes match exactly. Transforms are based on transforms of the SRTP protocol and these transforms might use the RTP padding format, so a RTP like padding is supported. If the padding count field is present, than the padding count field MUST be set to the padding length.
 </p>
 <a name="anchor20"></a><br /><hr />
 <table summary="layout" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="2" class="TOCbug" align="right"><tr><td class="TOCbug"><a href="#toc">&nbsp;TOC&nbsp;</a></td></tr></table>
@@ -546,7 +546,7 @@ Encryption</h3>
 
 <p>Encryption is done in the same way as for <a class='info' href='#RFC3711'>SRTP<span> (</span><span class='info'>Baugher, M., McGrew, D., Naslund, M., Carrara, E., and K. Norrman, &ldquo;The Secure Real-time Transport Protocol (SRTP),&rdquo; March&nbsp;2004.</span><span>)</span></a> [1]. This section will only discuss some small changes that HAVE TO be made. Please read  <a class='info' href='#RFC3711'>SRTP RFC3711 section 3-9<span> (</span><span class='info'>Baugher, M., McGrew, D., Naslund, M., Carrara, E., and K. Norrman, &ldquo;The Secure Real-time Transport Protocol (SRTP),&rdquo; March&nbsp;2004.</span><span>)</span></a> [1] for details. 
 </p>
-<p>The least significant bits of SSRC are replaced by the sender ID and the rest is filled with zeros. For the SRTP SEQ the 16 least significant bits of the SATP sequence number are used and the 16 most significant bits of the sequence number replace the 16 least significant bits of the SRTP ROC.
+<p>The least significant bits of SSRC are replaced by the sender ID and the most significant bits are replaced by the mux. For the SRTP SEQ the 16 least significant bits of the SATP sequence number are used and the 16 most significant bits of the sequence number replace the 16 least significant bits of the SRTP ROC.
 </p><br /><hr class="insert" />
 <a name="srtp_vs_satp"></a>
 
@@ -579,7 +579,7 @@ Encryption</h3>
 <a name="rfc.section.5"></a><h3>5.&nbsp;
 Security Considerations</h3>
 
-<p>As SATP uses the same encrytion technics as <a class='info' href='#RFC3711'>SRTP<span> (</span><span class='info'>Baugher, M., McGrew, D., Naslund, M., Carrara, E., and K. Norrman, &ldquo;The Secure Real-time Transport Protocol (SRTP),&rdquo; March&nbsp;2004.</span><span>)</span></a> [1], it shares the same security issues. This section will only discuss some small changes. Please read  <a class='info' href='#RFC3711'>SRTP RFC3711 section 9<span> (</span><span class='info'>Baugher, M., McGrew, D., Naslund, M., Carrara, E., and K. Norrman, &ldquo;The Secure Real-time Transport Protocol (SRTP),&rdquo; March&nbsp;2004.</span><span>)</span></a> [1] for details.
+<p>As SATP uses the same encryption techniques as <a class='info' href='#RFC3711'>SRTP<span> (</span><span class='info'>Baugher, M., McGrew, D., Naslund, M., Carrara, E., and K. Norrman, &ldquo;The Secure Real-time Transport Protocol (SRTP),&rdquo; March&nbsp;2004.</span><span>)</span></a> [1], it shares the same security issues. This section will only discuss some small changes. Please read  <a class='info' href='#RFC3711'>SRTP RFC3711 section 9<span> (</span><span class='info'>Baugher, M., McGrew, D., Naslund, M., Carrara, E., and K. Norrman, &ldquo;The Secure Real-time Transport Protocol (SRTP),&rdquo; March&nbsp;2004.</span><span>)</span></a> [1] for details.
 </p>
 <a name="anchor25"></a><br /><hr />
 <table summary="layout" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="2" class="TOCbug" align="right"><tr><td class="TOCbug"><a href="#toc">&nbsp;TOC&nbsp;</a></td></tr></table>